08/04/2025 / By Laura Harris
Spotify has begun warning users that they risk losing access to their accounts unless they complete a new age verification process, following the recent enactment of the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act (OSA).
OSA, which came into full force this July, mandates that digital platforms enforce strict age checks and limit minors’ access to content deemed harmful, including pornography, graphic violence and other adult material. Companies that fail to comply face penalties, including fines of up to £18 million ($24 million) or 10 percent of their global revenue, and in extreme cases, could be cut off from advertisers, payment processors or even blocked by U.K. internet providers.
In response, Spotify has begun prompting users to verify their age through a third-party app, Yoti, which uses facial scanning to estimate age and requests official identification if the software detects someone who may be underage. If it detects someone who appears underage, Spotify will prompt the user to provide government-issued identification.
A growing number of users have reported receiving in-app notifications in recent days, instructing them to complete this verification process. If a user fails to do so within 90 days, their Spotify account will be “deactivated and eventually deleted.” (Related: U.K. government to launch digital ID wallet this summer.)
“You cannot use Spotify if you don’t meet the minimum age requirements for the market you’re in,” the updated policy page of Spotify read. The minimum age to create a Spotify account remains 13 in most countries.
According to its updated policy page, the new age verification system will be selectively triggered, especially when a user attempts to access content flagged as adult-only. For example, attempting to play an 18+ rated music video may prompt a facial scan to confirm the user’s eligibility.
“Some users will now have to confirm their age by going through an age assurance process,” Spotify stated.
A growing list of tech companies has introduced similar measures in recent months.
For instance, Reddit users in the U.K. are now required to verify their age using either a government-issued ID or facial recognition technology to access content flagged as inappropriate for minors. Reddit, known for its semi-anonymous communities, began implementing these changes on July 14 through a partnership with identity verification firm Persona. U.K. users must now submit a government ID or selfie to prove their age, with failure to comply resulting in restricted access to much of the platform, regardless of actual age.
Bluesky made a similar announcement in a July 10 blog post titled “Working with the U.K. Government to Protect Children Online.” Bluesky announced that U.K.-based users will soon be required to verify their age using Kid Web Services (KWS), a tool developed by Epic Games for age verification and parental controls.
Users can choose from various verification methods, including facial scanning, government-issued ID upload or credit card authentication. While those under 18 or who opt not to verify their age will not be banned, they will face restrictions such as blocked access to adult content and the disabling of features like direct messaging.
Follow PrivacyWatch.news for more news about the digital ID system.
Watch this video to learn how the digital ID will control your life.
This video is from the Data Dumper channel on Brighteon.com.
Digital ID system incoming: Nebraska now collecting citizens’ digital health data.
Utah introduces new digital ID blockchain law.
EU collaborates with foreign governments on digital ID.
Diabolical — How digital ID will control your life.
Australia following Communist China’s footsteps with digital ID system.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
age verification, Big Brother, Big Tech, deception, digital IDs, face recognition, freedom, Glitch, information technology, insanity, Liberty, Orwellian, privacy watch, spotify, surveillance, tech giants, totalitarianism, Tyranny, watched
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 BANNED.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Banned.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Banned.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.